Development in attention functions and social processing: Evidence from the Attention Network Test
Corresponding Author
Francesca Federico
Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Correspondence should be addressed to Francesca Federico, Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, Sapienza Università di Roma, 78 via dei Marsi, Rome 00185, Italy (email: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorAndrea Marotta
Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Department of Experimental Psychology and Physiology of Behaviour, Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center, University of Granada, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorDiana Martella
Faculty of Social Science, Autonomous University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
Search for more papers by this authorMaria Casagrande
Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Francesca Federico
Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Correspondence should be addressed to Francesca Federico, Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, Sapienza Università di Roma, 78 via dei Marsi, Rome 00185, Italy (email: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorAndrea Marotta
Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Department of Experimental Psychology and Physiology of Behaviour, Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center, University of Granada, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorDiana Martella
Faculty of Social Science, Autonomous University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
Search for more papers by this authorMaria Casagrande
Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
According to the attention network approach, attention is best understood in terms of three functionally and neuroanatomically distinct networks – alerting, orienting, and executive attention. Recent findings showed that social information influences the efficiency of these networks in adults. Using some social and non-social variants of the Attentional Network Test (ANT), this study was aimed to evaluate the development of the three attention networks in childhood, also assessing the development of the ability to manage social or non-social conflicting information. Sixty-six children (three groups of 6, 8, and 10 years of age) performed three variants of the original ANT, using fish, schematic, or real faces looking to the left or right as target and flanker stimuli. Results showed an improvement from 6 to 8 and 10 years of age in reaction time (RT) and accuracy, together with an improvement of executive control and a decrement in alerting. These developmental changes were not unique to social stimuli, and no differences were observed between social and no-social variants of the ANT. However, independently from the age of the children, a real face positively affected the executive control (as indexed by RTs) as compared to both a schematic face and a fish. Findings of this study suggest that attentional networks are still developing from 6 to 10 years of age and underline the importance of face information in modulating the efficiency of executive control.
Statement of contribution
What is already known?
- Younger children made more errors and slower reaction times (RTs) than older children, in line with the majority of the past selective attention studies.
- Younger children showed both greater conflict and alerting effect than older children. The prediction that younger children would display larger interference effects than older children was supported.
What does this study add?
- Extending the findings observed in adults and children, independently from their age, demonstrated greater cognitive interference (i.e., slower RTs and higher percentage of errors to incongruent relative to congruent conditions) when fish and schematic faces were presented than when photographs of real faces were used as stimuli.
- Like adults, children have a greater ability in the control of social information as compared to non-social information.
- These results seem to indicate that the ability to handle social conflicts proceeds in parallel with the ability to manage non-social conflicting information.
References
- Barnes, K. A., Kaplan, L. A., & Vaidya, C. J. (2007). Developmental differences in cognitive control of socio-affective processing. Developmental Neuropsychology, 32, 787–807. doi:10.1080/87565640701539576
- Bhatt, R. S., Bertin, E., Hayden, A., & Reed, A. (2005). Face processing in infancy: Developmental changes in the use of different kinds of relational information. Child Development, 76(1), 169–181. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00837
- Birmingham, E., & Kingstone, A. (2009). Human social attention. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156(1), 118–140. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04468
- Brooks, R., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2005). The development of gaze following and its relation to language. Developmental Science, 8, 535–543. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00445
- Brooks, R., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Connecting the dots from infancy to childhood: A longitudinal study connecting gaze following, language, and explicit theory of mind. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 130, 67–78.
- Butterworth, G., & Jarrett, N. (1991). What minds have in common is space: Spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(1), 55–72. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.1991.tb00862
- Calder, A. J., Beaver, J. D., Winston, J. S., Dolan, R. J., Jenkins, R., Eger, E., & Henson, R. N. A. (2007). Separate coding of different gaze directions in the superior temporal sulcus and inferior parietal lobule. Current Biology, 17(1), 20–25. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.052
- Callejas, A., Lupianez, J., Funes, M. J., & Tudela, P. (2005). Modulations among the alerting, orienting and executive control Networks. Experimental Brain Research, 167, 27–37.
- Callejas, A., Lupianez, J., & Tudela, P. (2004). The three attentional networks: On their independence and interactions. Brain and Cognition, 54, 225–227.
- Carey, S., Diamond, R., & Woods, B. (1980). Development of face recognition: A maturational component? Developmental Psychology, 16, 257–269. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.16.4.257
- Carver, L. J., Dawson, G., Panagiotides, H., Meltzoff, A. N., McPartland, J., Gray, J., & Munson, J. (2003). Age-related differences in neural correlates of face recognition during the toddler and preschool years. Developmental Psychobiology, 42, 148–159. doi:10.1002/dev.10078
- Casagrande, M., Martella, D., Ruggiero, M. C., Maccari, L., Paloscia, C., Rosa, C., & Pasini, A. (2012). Assessing attentional systems in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27, 30–44. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2148-0
- Casey, B. J., Durston, S., & Fossella, J. A. (2001). Evidence for a mechanistic model of cognitive control. Clinical Neuroscience Research, 1, 267–282. doi:10.1016/S1566-2772(01)00013-5
- Dawson, G., Meltzoff, A. N., Osterling, J., Rinaldi, J., & Brown, E. (1998). Children with autism fail to orient to naturally occurring social stimuli. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 479–485.
- D'Entremont, B., Hains, S. M. J., & Muir, D. W. (1997). A demonstration of gaze following in 3- to 6-month-olds. Infant Behavior and Development, 20, 560–572.
- Dichter, G. S., & Belger, A. (2007). Social stimuli interfere with cognitive control in autism. NeuroImage, 35, 1219–1230. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.038
- Doherty-Sneddon, G., Bruce, V., Bonner, L., Longbotham, S., & Doyle, C. (2002). Development of gaze aversion as disengagement from visual information. Developmental Psychology, 38, 438–445. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.3.438
- Ellis, H., Shepherd, J., & Bruce, A. (1973). The effects of age and sex upon adolescents’ recognition of faces. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 123(1), 173–174. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000100
- Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 581–604. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00025-7
- Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149. doi:10.3758/BF03203267
- Fan, J., Gu, X., Guise, K. G., Liu, X., Fossella, J., Wang, H., & Posner, M. I. (2009). Testing the behavioral interaction and integration of attentional networks. Brain and Cognition, 70, 209–220. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2009.02.002
- Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347. doi:10.1162/089892902317361886
- Farroni, T., Johnson, M. H., Menon, E., Zulian, L., Faraguna, D., & Csibra, G. (2005). Newborns’ preference for face-relevant stimuli: Effects of contrast polarity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 17245–17250.
- Federico, F., Marotta, A., Adriani, T., Maccari, L., & Casagrande, M. (2013). Attention network test–the impact of social information on executive control, alerting and orienting. Acta Psychologica, 143(1), 65–70. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.02.006
- Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 490–495. doi:10.3758/BF03208827
- Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 694–724. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694
- George, N., & Conty, L. (2008). Facing the gaze of others. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology, 38, 197–207. doi:10.1016/j.neucli.2008.03.001
- Hainline, L. (1978). Developmental changes in visual scanning of face and nonface patterns by infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 25(1), 90–115. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(78)90041-3
- Jingling, L., Lin, H. F., Tsai, C. J., & Lin, C. C. (2015). Development of inhibition of return for eye gaze in adolescents. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 137, 76–84.
- Johnson, M. H. (2005). Subcortical face processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 766–774. doi:10.1038/nrn1766
- Johnson, M. H., Dziurawiec, S., Ellis, H., & Morton, J. (1991). Newborns’ preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition, 40(1), 1–19. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(91)90045-6
- Kingstone, A. (2009). Taking a real look at social attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19, 52–56.
- Kingstone, A., Friesen, C. K., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2000). Reflexive joint attention depends on lateralized cortical connections. Psychological Science, 11, 159–166. doi:10.1111/j.1467
- Kingstone, A., Smilek, D., & Eastwood, J. D. (2008). Cognitive ethology: A new approach for studying human cognition. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 317–345.
- Kristen, S., Sodian, B., Thoermer, C., & Perst, H. (2011). Infants’ joint attention skills predict toddlers’ emerging mental state language. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1207–1219.
- Kuhn, G., Tewson, L., Morpurgo, L., Freebody, S. F., Musil, A. S., & Leekam, S. R. (2011). Developmental changes in the control of saccadic eye movements in response to directional eye gaze and arrows. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1919–1929. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.592592
- Leekam, S. R., Lopez, B., & Moore, C. (2000). Attention and joint attention in preschool children with autism. Developmental Psychology, 36, 261–273.
- Marotta, A., Casagrande, M., & Lupianez, J. (2013). Object-based attentional effects in response to eye gaze and arrow cues. Acta Psychologica, 143, 317–321. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.04.006
- Marotta, A., Delle Chiaie, R., Spagna, A., Bernabei, L., Sciarretta, M., Roca, J., … Casagrande, M. (2015). Impaired conflict resolution and vigilance in euthymic bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Research, 229, 490–496. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.06.026
- Marotta, A., Lupiáñez, J., & Casagrande, M. (2012). Investigating hemispheric lateralization of reflexive attention to gaze and arrow cues. Brain and cognition, 80, 361–366. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.08.001
- Marotta, A., Pasini, A., Ruggiero, S., Maccari, L., Rosa, C., Lupiáñez, J., & Casagrande, M. (2013). Inhibition of return in response to eye gaze and peripheral cues in young people with Asperger's syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 917–923.
- Martella, D., Casagrande, M., & Lupianez, J. (2011). Alerting, orienting and executive control: The effects of sleep deprivation on attentional networks. Experimental Brain Research, 210(1), 81–89. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2605-3
- Mondloch, C. J., Geldart, S., Maurer, D., & Grand, R. L. (2003). Developmental changes in face processing skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86(1), 67–84. doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00102-4
- Mullane, J. C., Lawrence, M. A., Corkum, P. V., Klein, R. M., & McLaughlin, E. N. (2014). The development of and interaction among alerting, orienting, and executive attention in children. Child Neuropsychology, 22, 155–176. doi:10.1080/09297049.2014.981252
- Osterling, J. A., Dawson, G., & Munson, J. A. (2002). Early recognition of 1-year-old infants with autism spectrum disorder versus mental retardation. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 239–251.
- Perrett, D. I., Hietanen, J. K., Oram, M. W., Benson, P. J., & Rolls, E. T. (1992). Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex [and discussion]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 335, 23–30.
- Petersen, S. E., & Posner, M. I. (2012). The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35, 73–89. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150525
- Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150525
- Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Educating the human brain. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.1037/11519-000 Google Scholar
- Posner, M. I., Rothbart, M. K., Sheese, B. E., & Voelker, P. (2014). Developing Attention: Behavioral and Brain Mechanisms. Advances in Neuroscience, 405094. doi:10.1155/2014/405094
- Pozuelos, J. P., Paz-Alonso, P. M., Castillo, A., Fuentes, L. J., & Rueda, M. R. (2014). Development of attention networks and their interactions in childhood. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2405–2415. doi:10.1037/a0037469
- Puce, A., Allison, T., Bentin, S., Gore, J. C., & McCarthy, G. (1998). Temporal cortex activation in humans viewing eye and mouth movements. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 2188–2199.
- Ridderinkhof, K. R., van der Molen, M. W., Band, G. P. H., & Bashore, T. R. (1997). Sources of interference from irrelevant information: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 315–341. doi:10.1006/jecp.1997.2367
- Roca, J., Fuentes, L. J., Marotta, A., López-Ramón, M. F., Castro, C., Lupiáñez, J., & Martella, D. (2012). The effects of sleep deprivation on the attentional functions and vigilance. Acta Psychologica, 140, 164–176. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.03.007
- Rueda, M. R., Checa, P., & Combita, L. M. (2012). Enhanced efficiency of the executive attention network after training in preschool children: Immediate changes and effects after two months. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, S192–S204.
- Rueda, M. R., Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Halparin, J. D., Gruber, D. B., Lercari, L. P., & Posner, M. I. (2004). Development of attentional networks in childhood. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1029–1040. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.012
- Rueda, M. R., Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2005). The development of executive attention: Contributions to the emergence of self-regulation. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 573–594. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2802_2
- Rueda, M. R., Posner, M. I., Rothbart, M. K., & Davis-Stober, C. P. (2004). Development of the time course for processing conflict: An event-related potentials study with 4 year olds and adults. BMC Neuroscience, 5, 39. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-5-39
- Rueda, M. R., Rothbart, M. K., McCandliss, B. D., Saccomanno, L., & Posner, M. I. (2005). Training, maturation, and genetic influences on the development of executive attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 14931–14936. doi:10.1073/pnas.0506897102
- Schultz, R. T. (2005). Developmental deficits in social perception in autism: The role of the amygdala and fusiform face area. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 23, 125–141. doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2004.12.012
- Shepherd, S. V. (2010). Following gaze: Gaze-following behavior as a window into social cognition. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 4, 1–13. doi:10.3389/fnint.2010.00005
- Smilek, D., Eastwood, J. D., Reynolds, M. G., & Kingstone, A. (2008). Metacognition and change detection: Do lab and life really converge? Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 1056–1061.
- Sowell, E. R., Thompson, P. M., Leonard, C. M., Welcome, S. E., Kan, E., & Toga, A. W. (2004). Longitudinal mapping of cortical thickness and brain growth in normal children. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 8223–8231.
- Spagna, A., Martella, D., Sebastiani, M., Maccari, L., Marotta, A., & Casagrande, M. (2014). Efficiency and interactions of alerting, orienting and executive networks: The impact of imperative stimulus type. Acta Psychologica, 148, 209–215. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.007
- Swick, D., & Turken, A. U. (2002). Dissociation between conflict detection and error monitoring in the human anterior cingulate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 99, 16354–16359.
- Valenza, E., Simion, F., Cassia, V. M., & Umiltà, C. (1996). Face preference at birth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 892.
- van der Molen, M. W. (2000). Developmental changes in inhibitory processing: Evidence from psychophysiological measures. Biological Psychology, 54, 207–239. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(00)00057-0
- Whitney, D., & Levi, D. M. (2011). Visual crowding: A fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 160–168. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.005
- Wicker, B., Michel, F., Henaff, M.-A., & Decety, J. (1998). Brain regions involved in the perception of gaze: A PET study. NeuroImage, 8, 221–227.