Volume 88, Issue 3 p. 428-445
Original Article

An online growth mindset intervention in a sample of rural adolescent girls

Jeni L. Burnette

Corresponding Author

Jeni L. Burnette

NCSU Psychology Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Jeni L. Burnette, NCSU Psychology Department, North Carolina State University, 640 Poe Hall, Campus Box 7650, Raleigh, NC, USA (email: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
Michelle V. Russell

Michelle V. Russell

NCSU Psychology Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Crystal L. Hoyt

Crystal L. Hoyt

University of Richmond, Virginia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kasey Orvidas

Kasey Orvidas

NCSU Psychology Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Laura Widman

Laura Widman

NCSU Psychology Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 September 2017
Citations: 57

Abstract

Background

Students living in rural areas of the United States exhibit lower levels of educational attainment than their suburban counterparts. Innovative interventions are needed to close this educational achievement gap.

Aims

We investigated whether an online growth mindset intervention could be leveraged to promote academic outcomes.

Sample

We tested the mindset intervention in a sample of 222 10th-grade adolescent girls (M age = 15.2; 38% White, 25% Black, 29% Hispanic) from four rural, low-income high schools in the Southeastern United States.

Methods

We conducted a randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of the growth mindset intervention, relative to a sexual health programme. We used random sampling and allocation procedures to assign girls to either the mindset intervention (= 115) or an attention-matched control programme (= 107). We assessed participants at pre-test, immediate post-test, and 4-month follow-up.

Results

Relative to the control condition, students assigned to the mindset intervention reported stronger growth mindsets at immediate post-test and 4-month follow-up. Although the intervention did not have a total effect on academic attitudes or grades, it indirectly increased motivation to learn, learning efficacy and grades via the shifts in growth mindsets.

Conclusions

Results indicate that this intervention is a promising method to encourage growth mindsets in rural adolescent girls.