Volume 55, Issue 4 p. 643-661
Original Article

Global identification predicts gay–male identity integration and well-being among Turkish gay men

Yasin Koc

Corresponding Author

Yasin Koc

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK

Correspondence should be addressed to Yasin Koc, School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9QH, UK (email: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
Vivian L. Vignoles

Vivian L. Vignoles

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 September 2016
Citations: 18

Abstract

In most parts of the world, hegemonic masculinity requires men to endorse traditional masculine ideals, one of which is rejection of homosexuality. Wherever hegemonic masculinity favours heterosexuality over homosexuality, gay males may feel under pressure to negotiate their conflicting male gender and gay sexual identities to maintain positive self-perceptions. However, globalization, as a source of intercultural interaction, might provide a beneficial context for people wishing to create alternative masculinities in the face of hegemonic masculinity. Hence, we tested if global identification would predict higher levels of gay–male identity integration, and indirectly subjective well-being, via alternative masculinity representations for gay and male identities. A community sample of 219 gay and bisexual men from Turkey completed the study. Structural equation modelling revealed that global identification positively predicted gay–male identity integration, and indirectly subjective well-being; however, alternative masculinity representations did not mediate this relationship. Our findings illustrate how identity categories in different domains can intersect and affect each other in complex ways. Moreover, we discuss mental health and well-being implications for gay men living in cultures where they experience high levels of prejudice and stigma.