Volume 64, Issue 1 e12790
ARTICLE

Yes, we can (but for different reasons): Collective narcissism is linked to different values but similar pro-ingroup collective action tendencies among disadvantaged and advantaged ethnic groups

Gaëlle Marinthe

Corresponding Author

Gaëlle Marinthe

Institute of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warszawa, Poland

Laboratoire Parisien de Psychologie Sociale, University of Paris 8, Saint-Denis, France

Correspondence

Gaëlle Marinthe, UFR de Psychologie, Université Paris 8, 2 rue de la Liberté, 93200 Saint-Denis, France.

Email: [email protected]

Contribution: Conceptualization, Writing - original draft, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing - review & editing, Formal analysis, Project administration, Data curation, Resources, Supervision

Search for more papers by this author
Aleksandra Cislak

Aleksandra Cislak

Institute of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warszawa, Poland

Contribution: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing, Methodology, Validation, Project administration, Supervision, Resources

Search for more papers by this author
Samantha Stronge

Samantha Stronge

School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Contribution: Methodology, Visualization, Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing, Writing - original draft, Data curation, ​Investigation, Resources

Search for more papers by this author
Mikey Biddlestone

Mikey Biddlestone

School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

Contribution: ​Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing, Data curation, Resources

Search for more papers by this author
Flavio Azevedo

Flavio Azevedo

Department of Interdisciplinary Social Studies, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Contribution: ​Investigation, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Resources

Search for more papers by this author
Alice Kasper

Alice Kasper

Laboratoire de Psychologie: Cognition, Comportement, Communication, University of Rennes 2, Rennes, France

Contribution: Writing - review & editing, Validation

Search for more papers by this author
Chris G. Sibley

Chris G. Sibley

School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Contribution: ​Investigation, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing, Methodology, Data curation, Resources

Search for more papers by this author
Aleksandra Cichocka

Aleksandra Cichocka

School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

Contribution: Conceptualization, ​Investigation, Writing - review & editing, Validation, Visualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Project administration, Data curation, Supervision, Resources

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 July 2024

Abstract

Collective narcissism, a belief that one's group is exceptional and entitled to special treatment but underappreciated by others, is related to important social and political outcomes but has been predominantly studied in advantaged groups. The present research compares the motivational correlates (through values) of collective narcissism in ethnic groups of different status (advantaged and disadvantaged) and explores its associations with attitudes towards, and intention to engage in collective action. Three studies examined these processes in different national and intergroup contexts (total N = 16,275). Overall, ethnic collective narcissism was linked to self-protective values (power, and less consistently, conservation) in advantaged groups but to universalism in disadvantaged groups. Moreover, in both advantaged and disadvantaged groups, ethnic collective narcissism was related to more positive attitudes towards, and intentions of pro-ingroup actions but not to attitudes towards (other) disadvantaged groups (i.e., intergroup solidarity). These studies suggest that collective narcissism may be associated with different motivations, yet linked to similar intergroup attitudes among advantaged and disadvantaged groups.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest. This manuscript has not been submitted or published elsewhere, in whole or in part.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data from Study 1, analysis code and material (items) for all studies are available at the OSF and can be accessed at: https://osf.io/tw64n/. Data from Study 2 are under embargo and therefore not publicly available, but details on material can be found at: https://ppbs.flavioazevedo.com/. Data from Study 3 are available upon request from Chris Sibley ([email protected]), or any member of the NZAVS advisory board for the purposes of replication or checking of any published study using NZAVS data. The Mplus syntax used to test all models reported in this manuscript are available on the NZAVS website: www.nzavs.auckland.ac.nz. No studies were preregistered.