Leader affective presence, psychological safety and team proactive problem prevention
Corresponding Author
Hector P. Madrid
School of Business, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Peñalolén, Chile
Correspondence
Hector P. Madrid, Escuela de Negocios, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Avenida Diagonal las Torres 2700, Peñalolén, Chile.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCristian A. Vasquez
Institute of Work Psychology, Sheffield University Management School, Sheffield, UK
Search for more papers by this authorMaximiliano Escaffi-Schwarz
Facultad de Administración y Economia, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Hector P. Madrid
School of Business, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Peñalolén, Chile
Correspondence
Hector P. Madrid, Escuela de Negocios, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Avenida Diagonal las Torres 2700, Peñalolén, Chile.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCristian A. Vasquez
Institute of Work Psychology, Sheffield University Management School, Sheffield, UK
Search for more papers by this authorMaximiliano Escaffi-Schwarz
Facultad de Administración y Economia, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Leader affective presence, the tendency of leaders to consistently evoke feelings in team members, has gained prominence in the context of leadership and teamwork. However, prior research lacks a comprehensive theoretical framework, focuses on limited team processes, and relies mainly on cross sectional designs to study this construct. Building upon theories of the social functions of affect, this study examines the relationship between leaders' affective presence and team member behaviour, specifically focusing on team proactive problem prevention and examining whether this relationship is mediated by team psychological safety. Using a two-wave panel model with 504 professionals in 134 teams, our findings revealed that positive leader affective presence, characterized by instilling enthusiasm, joy and inspiration among team members, was positively associated with perceptions of team psychological safety. In turn, team psychological safety was positively related to leaders' assessments of proactive problem prevention. Interestingly, negative leader affective presence, which triggers worry, tension and stress, was not related to team psychological safety but was positively associated with team proactive problem prevention. These results highlight the importance of leader affective presence in shaping emergent team states and team member behaviour. Researchers and practitioners should thus consider these insights when assessing and intervening in leadership and teamwork processes in organizations.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare no conflict of interest associated with this study.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data supporting our study findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010
- Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193(5), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1155-31
- Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (2012). Group affect: Its influence on individual and group outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(2), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412438352
10.1177/0963721412438352 Google Scholar
- Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger that good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 Google Scholar
- Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
- Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait method analyses of the big five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729
- Bindl, U., Parker, S. K., Totterdell, P., & Hagger-Johnson, G. (2012). Fuel of the self-starter: How mood relates to proactive goal regulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024368
- Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (Vol. XXIX, p. 605). Jossey-Bass.
- Bollen, K. A., Fisher, Z. F., Giordano, M. L., Lilly, A. G., Luo, L., & Ye, A. (2021). An introduction to model implied instrumental variables using two stage least squares (MIIV-2SLS) in structural equation models (SEMs). Psychological Methods., 27, 752–772. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000297
- Bono, J. E., & Ilies, R. (2006). Charisma, positive emotions and mood contagion. Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.008
- Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press.
- Burke, M. J., & Dunlap, W. P. (2002). Estimating interrater agreement with the average deviation index: A user's guide. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428102005002002
- Byrne, B. M., & Stewart, S. M. (2006). The MACS approach to testing for multigroup invariance of a second-order structure: A walk through the process. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(2), 287–321. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_7
- Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
- Cangiano, F., Bindl, U. K., & Parker, S. K. (2017). The hot side of proactivity: Exploring and affect-based perspective of proactivity in organizations. In S. K. Parker & U. K. Bindl (Eds.), Proactivity at work: Making things happen in organizations. Routledge.
- Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234
- Chen, Y., & Li, F. (2023). Trait affective presence and leadership emergence: A preliminary study. Current Psychology, 42(16), 13301–13307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02618-2
- Chen, Y., Qiang, W., & Li, F. (2024). Leader trait affective presence and safety behaviors: The role of work engagement. Safety Science, 169, 106339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106339
- Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558
- De Jong, B. A., Dirks, K., & Gillespie, N. (2015). Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, contingencies, and qualifiers. Academy of Management Journal, 101(8), 744–749. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2015.234
10.5465/AMBPP.2015.234 Google Scholar
- Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
- Edmondson, A. C., & Bransby, D. P. (2023). Psychological safety comes of age: Observed themes in an established literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(10), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920
10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217 Google Scholar
- Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
- Eisenkraft, N., & Elfenbein, H. A. (2010). The way you make me feel: Evidence for individual differences in affective presence. Psychological Science, 21(4), 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610364117
- Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017). Psychological safety: A meta-analytic review and extension. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12183
- Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23(1), 133–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23005-6
10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23005-6 Google Scholar
- Gaddis, B., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). Failure feedback as an affective event: Influences of leader affect on subordinate attitudes and performance. Leadership Quarterly, 15(5), 663–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.05.011
- George, J. M., & Bettenhausen, K. (1990). Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 698–709. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.698
- Glomb, T. M., & Hulin, C. L. (1997). Anger and gender effects in observed supervisor-subordinate dyadic interactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72(3), 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1997.2741
- Harris, T. B., & Kirkman, B. L. (2017). Teams and proactivity. In S. K. Parker & U. K. Bindl (Eds.), Proactivity at work: Making things happen in organizations (pp. 530–558). Routledge.
- Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, R. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge University Press.
- Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter? Psychological Science, 24(10), 1918–1927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480187
- Hill, A. D., Johnson, S. G., Greco, L. M., O'Boyle, E. H., & Walter, S. L. (2021). Endogeneity: A review and agenda for the methodology-practice divide affecting micro and macro research. Journal of Management, 47(1), 105–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320960533
- Hollenbeck, J. R. (2008). The role of editing in knowledge development: Consensus shifting and consensus creation. In Y. Baruch, M. Konrad, H. Aguinis & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Journal editing: Opening the black box (pp. 16–26). Jossey Bass.
10.1057/9780230582590_2 Google Scholar
- Hood, A. C., Bachrach, D. G., Zivnuska, S., & Bendoly, E. (2016). Mediating effects of psychological safety in the relationship between team affectivity and transactive memory systems. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(3), 416–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2050
- Jiang, J., Dong, Y., Li, B., Gu, H., & Yu, L. (2020). Do feelings matter? The effect of leader affective presence on employee proactive customer service performance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(7), 2305–2323. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2019-0538
- Jiang, J., Gu, H., Dong, Y., & Tu, X. (2019). The better I feel, the better I can do: The role of leaders' positive affective presence. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 78, 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.09.007
- Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
- Kline, R. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
- Knight, A. P., & Eisenkraft, N. (2015). Positive is usually good, negative is not always bad: The effects of group affect on social integration and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1214–1227. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000006
- Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 77–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
- Lawler, E. J. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 321–352. https://doi.org/10.1086/324071
- Lazarus, R. S. (2001). Relational meaning and discrete emotions. In Appraisal processes in emotion. Theory, methods, research. Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oso/9780195130072.003.0003 Google Scholar
- LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. J. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
- Lewis, K. M. (2000). When leaders display emotion: How followers respond to negative emotional expression of male and female leaders. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200003)21:2%3C221::AID-JOB36%3E3.0.CO;2-0
- Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0176
- Little, T. D., Preacher, K. J., Selig, J. P., & Card, N. A. (2007). New developments in latent variable panel analyses of longitudinal data. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(4), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407077757
- Liu, W., Song, Z., Li, X., & Liao, Z. (2017). Why and when leaders' affective states influence employee upward voice. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 238–263. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.1082
- MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Madrid, H. P., Totterdell, P., & Niven, K. (2016). Does leader-affective presence influence communication of creative ideas within work teams? Emotion, 16(6), 798–802. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000183
- Madrid, H. P., Totterdell, P., Niven, K., & Barros, E. (2016). Leader affective presence and innovation in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(5), 673–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000078
- Madrid, H. P., Totterdell, P., Niven, K., & Vasquez, C. A. (2018). Investigating a process model for leader affective presence, interpersonal emotion regulation, and interpersonal behaviour in teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(5), 642–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1505719
- Mathieu, J. E., Gallagher, P. T., Domingo, M. A., & Klock, E. A. (2019). Embracing complexity: Reviewing the past Decade of team effectiveness research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 17–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015106
10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015106 Google Scholar
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825–847). Academic Press.
10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50032-9 Google Scholar
- Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 373–412. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.574506
- Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.5465/257011
- Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2–3), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.678
- Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310363732
- Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554
- Parker, S. K., Wang, Y., & Liao, J. (2019). When is proactivity wise? A review of factors that influence the individual outcomes of proactive behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015302
10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015302 Google Scholar
- Parkinson, B. (2019). Heart to heart: How your emotions affect other people. Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/9781108696234 Google Scholar
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
- Preacher, K. J., & Selig, J. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.679848
10.1080/19312458.2012.679848 Google Scholar
- Rapp, T., Maynard, T., Domingo, M., & Klock, E. (2021). Team emergent states: What has emerged in the literature over 20 years. Small Group Research, 52(1), 68–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420956715
- Roesch, S. C., Norman, G. J., Merz, E. L., Sallis, J. F., & Patrick, K. (2013). Longitudinal measurement invariance of psychosocial measures in physical activity research: An application to adolescent data: Longitudinal measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(4), 721–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12000
- Schein, E. H., & Bennis, W. (1965). Personal and organizational change through group methods. Wiley.
- Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3–4), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2003.9682896
- Spector, P. E. (2019). Do Not Cross Me: Optimizing the Use of Cross-Sectional Designs. Journal of Business and Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8
- Sundstrom, E., McIntyre, M., Halfhill, T., & Richards, H. (2000). Work groups from the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990's and beyond. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.44
10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.44 Google Scholar
- Sy, T., Côté, S., & Saavedra, R. (2005). The contagious leader: The impact of the leader’s mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.295
- Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500
- Thomas, J. P., Whitman, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317910X502359
- Timmerman, T. A. (2005). Missing persons in the study of groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.306
- Van Kleef, G. A. (2014). Understanding the positive and negative effects of emotional expressions in organizations: EASI does it. Human Relations, 67(9), 1145–1164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713510329
- Van Kleef, G. A. (2018). The interpersonal dynamics of emotion: Towards an integrative theory of emotions as social information. Cambridge University Press.
- Van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A., & Cheshin, A. (2012). Emotional influence at work: Take it EASI. Organizational Psychology Review, 2(4), 311–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386612454911
- Van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Beersma, B., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B., & Damen, F. (2009). Searing sentiment or cold calculation? The effects of leader emotional displays on team performance depend on follower epistemic motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 562–580. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.41331253
- Van Knippenberg, D., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2016). Leadership and affect: Moving the hearts and minds of followers. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 799–840. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1160515
- Warr, P. B. (2007). Work, happiness and unhappiness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual-differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049
- Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 1–74). JAI Press.
- Williams, H. M., Parker, S. K., & Turner, N. (2010). Proactively performing teams: The role of work design, transformational leadership, and team composition. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317910X502494
- Xu, J., Zhang, Q., & Yang, Y. (2020). Impact of violations of measurement invariance in cross-lagged panel mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, 52(6), 2623–2645. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01426-z