Volume 96, Issue 2 p. 249-261

Signal regularity and the mindlessness model of vigilance

William S. Helton

Corresponding Author

William S. Helton

Michigan Technological University, USA

Department of Psychology, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 499312, USA (e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Todd D. Hollander

Todd D. Hollander

University of Cincinnati, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Joel S. Warm

Joel S. Warm

University of Cincinnati, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Gerald Matthews

Gerald Matthews

University of Cincinnati, USA

Search for more papers by this author
William N. Dember

William N. Dember

University of Cincinnati, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew Wallaart

Matthew Wallaart

University of Cincinnati, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Gerald Beauchamp

Gerald Beauchamp

University of Cincinnati, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Raja Parasuraman

Raja Parasuraman

George Mason University, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Peter A. Hancock

Peter A. Hancock

University of Central Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 31 December 2010
Citations: 102

Abstract

Robertson, Manly, Andrade, Baddeley, and Yiend (1997) have proposed that detection failures in vigilance tasks result from a ‘mindless’ withdrawal of attentional effort from the monitoring assignment. To explore that view, they modified the traditional vigilance task, in which observers make button-press responses to signify the detection of rarely occurring critical signals, to one in which button-press responses acknowledge frequently occurring non-signal events and response withholding signifies signal detection. This modification is designed to promote a mindless withdrawal of attentional effort from the task through routinization. The present study challenges the validity of the mindlessness model by showing that with both types of task, observers utilize subtle patterns in the temporal structure of critical signal appearances to develop expectations about the time course of those appearances that affect performance efficiency. Such expectations enhance performance on the traditional vigilance task, but degrade performance on the modified task.