Volume 14, Issue 4 p. 625-646

Evidence-based selection of theories for designing behaviour change interventions: Using methods based on theoretical construct domains to understand clinicians' blood transfusion behaviour

Jill J. Francis

Corresponding Author

Jill J. Francis

Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

Dr Jill J. Francis, Health Services Research Unit, Health Psychology Group, University of Aberdeen, 3rd Floor, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
Charlotte Stockton

Charlotte Stockton

College of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Martin P. Eccles

Martin P. Eccles

Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Marie Johnston

Marie Johnston

College of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Brian H. Cuthbertson

Brian H. Cuthbertson

Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

Intensive Care Unit, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Jeremy M. Grimshaw

Jeremy M. Grimshaw

Clinical Epidemiology Programme, Ottawa Health Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Chris Hyde

Chris Hyde

National Blood Transfusion Service, Oxford, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Alan Tinmouth

Alan Tinmouth

Clinical Epidemiology Programme, Ottawa Health Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Simon J. Stanworth

Simon J. Stanworth

National Blood Transfusion Service, Oxford, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 December 2010
Citations: 182

Abstract

Background Many theories of behaviour are potentially relevant to predictive and intervention studies but most studies investigate a narrow range of theories. Michie et al. (2005) agreed 12 ‘theoretical domains’ from 33 theories that explain behaviour change. They developed a ‘Theoretical Domains Interview’ (TDI) for identifying relevant domains for specific clinical behaviours, but the framework has not been used for selecting theories for predictive studies. It was used here to investigate clinicians' transfusion behaviour in intensive care units (ICU). Evidence suggests that red blood cells transfusion could be reduced for some patients without reducing quality of care.

Objectives (1) To identify the domains relevant to transfusion practice in ICUs and neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), using the TDI. (2) To use the identified domains to select appropriate theories for a study predicting transfusion behaviour.

Methods An adapted TDI about managing a patient with borderline haemoglobin by watching and waiting instead of transfusing red blood cells was used to conduct semi-structured, one-to-one interviews with 18 intensive care consultants and neonatologists across the UK.

Results Relevant theoretical domains were: knowledge, beliefs about capabilities, beliefs about consequences, social influences, behavioural regulation. Further analysis at the construct level resulted in selection of seven theoretical approaches relevant to this context: Knowledge-Attitude-Behaviour Model, Theory of Planned Behaviour, Social Cognitive Theory, Operant Learning Theory, Control Theory, Normative Model of Work Team Effectiveness and Action Planning Approaches.

Conclusions This study illustrated, the use of the TDI to identify relevant domains in a complex area of inpatient care. This approach is potentially valuable for selecting theories relevant to predictive studies and resulted in greater breadth of potential explanations than would be achieved if a single theoretical model had been adopted.